Clear Stream

Clear Stream

Wednesday, November 4, 2015

Maintaining certification, maintaining a parasite

I was looking through the ABD website, and the "Resource list"  http://www.abderm.org/moc/moc_tools.pdf  they publish was amended on 10/15/15. 

Dr Score.com, the previous entity through which we were exhorted to get patient and peer surveys, (founded and run by Dr. Steven Feldman, Derm at Wake Forest) was notably absent. Instead, a new business, MedConcert® is what they now list as "approved", this whole section is now optional of course. I believe Dr Score was removed due to all of our protests as to the inappropriate, opaque, and crony relationship which may or may not exist between the Board and Dr. Feldman. 

Of course, this now opens another argument, how was MedConcert® chosen, and why. 

I believe that all dermatologists who were forced into buying the DrScore product need to be refunded that cost due to the inappropriate and racketeering nature of the exercise. I can dream, right?



Here's the new  link through MedConnect®, a "social platform blah blah blah", "data collection" and "stakeholders" in the same paragraph --guaranteed to give you a migraine!


I received a nice letter from the FL attorney General that it isn't in their jurisdiction to address federal issues, that this doesn't pertain to the state. They listed the FL Congressional Representatives to contact. So now we need to contact Congress, another migraine...but I will write a new letter to my Congressional rep --Curtis Clawson (R) and senator Bill Nelson (D) and Marco Rubio (R). It can't hurt. I urge you all to do the same in your districts/states. They want to tie MOC to Medicare payment, probably licensure in the future. There's information to show this is ginning up at the federal level. 

The ABMS was found to have donated and lobbied heavily for MOC to be inserted into the HR-2 bill last year. ABD, as a member of ABMS, is guilty as well. 



Here's a sample letter from last years' MACRA push from DrWes' blog  Dr. Wes: Doctors: If You Hate MOC, Write To Your Senator Today


Dear Senator ________________,

As a practicing physician in the state of _______, I respectfully request that you vote “no” to the upcoming Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (H.R. 2) that amends title XVIII of the Social Security Act to repeal the Medicare sustainable growth rate (SGR). 

One argument for this bill is that it would repeal the flawed SGR and combine quality reporting programs to reward clinicians for improved patient outcomes.  However, several physician reporting registries within the bill are under investigation for anti-trust violations, tax fraud, misappropriation of physician testing fees, and use of fees to influence legislation thereby violating IRS rules for non-profit tax exempt status.  I encourage you to take another look and choose to defeat this highly flawed bill that will have a pernicious effect on the credibility of the legislation, practicing physician retention and patient access to health care.

There are several problems with this bill:

1. The American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM), an independent 501(c)(3) non-profit organization, operates a proprietary Maintenance of Certification™ (MOC) program on behalf of the American Board of Medical Specialties (ABMS), portions of which are used in the bill. An antitrust suit is pending in federal court against both organizations (Civil Action No: 3:13-cv-2609-PGS-LHG). Additionally, the legitimacy of the ABIM’s MOC program has been called into question because of improper tax filings, questionable accounting practices, and funneling $30.6 million in physician testing fees to a separate non-profit 501(c)(3) organization (the “ABIM Foundation”) operated by the same leadership.

2. Because many parts of the flawed MOC program are distributed throughout H.R. 2 as physician reporting measures, the credibility of this legislation will be called into question if the charges against the ABIM are substantiated.
 
3. In the same way that Democrats were held responsible for the shortcomings of the ACA in the last election, this Senate will be held responsible when physicians refuse to participate in corrupt value-based incentives that enrich constituents at the expense of actual patient care.
 
4. I strongly encourage you to vote “No” on H.R. 2 and instead ask the Justice Department to investigate the ABIM/ABMS Maintenance of Certification program’s legitimacy as a provider of a value-based registry to the US government as part of H.R. 2 given these recent revelations.

Sincerely,

(your name, address and contact info)



Reference: 




I called both my senators last spring right before this vote, and it did nothing. Bill Nelson voted for it, Marco Rubio voted against it, as did Ted Cruz, Mike Lee, and 5 others. The AMA was all for it, and now they're crying. I'm done with electing others to fight--AAD Advocacy, where are you? Phoning it in. 



Our little grains of sand may help to fill the bucket. It's the only way.

Fighting Obamacare

Message body